首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluation of surface roughness of enamel after various bonding and clean-up procedures on enamel bonded with three different bonding agents : an in-vitro study
【2h】

Evaluation of surface roughness of enamel after various bonding and clean-up procedures on enamel bonded with three different bonding agents : an in-vitro study

机译:在用三种不同的粘结剂粘结的瓷釉上进行各种粘结和清理程序后,评估瓷釉的表面粗糙度:一项体外研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare the enamel surface roughness before bonding and after debonding, to find correlation between the adhesive remnant index and its effect on enamel surface roughness and to evaluate which clean-up method is most efficient to provide a smoother enamel surface. 135 premolars were divided into 3 groups containing 45 premolars in each group. Group I was bonded by using moisture insensitive primer, Group II by using conventional orthodontic adhesive and Group III by using self-etching primer. Each group was divided into 3 sub-groups on the basis of type of clean-up method applied i,e scaling followed by polishing, tungsten carbide bur and Sof-Lex disc. Enamel surface roughness was measured and compared before bonding and after clean-up. Evaluation of pre bonding and post clean-up enamel surface roughness (Ra value) with the t test showed that Post clean-up Ra values were greater than Pre bonding Ra values in all the groups except in teeth bonded with self-etching primer cleaned with Sof-Lex disc. Reliability of ARI score taken at different time interval tested with Kruskal Wallis test suggested that all the readings were reliable. No clean-up procedure was able to restore the enamel to its original smoothness. Self-etching primer and Sof-Lex disc clean-up method combination restored the enamel surface roughness (Ra value) closest to its pre-treatment value.
机译:这项研究的目的是分析和比较粘结前后的釉质表面粗糙度,以找出胶粘剂残余指数与其对釉质表面粗糙度的影响之间的相关性,并评估哪种清洁方法最有效地提供光滑度。搪瓷表面。将135个前磨牙分为3组,每组45个前磨牙。使用湿敏底漆粘合第一组,使用常规正畸粘合剂粘合第二组,使用自蚀底漆粘合第三组。根据清洁方法的类型(即除垢,抛光,碳化钨针和Sof-Lex圆盘)将每组分为3个子组。在粘结之前和清理之后,测量并比较搪瓷表面的粗糙度。用t检验评估粘结前和清理后牙釉质的表面粗糙度(Ra值)表明,除用自洁底漆粘结的牙齿外,所有组的粘结后Ra值均大于粘结前Ra值。 Sof-Lex光盘。使用Kruskal Wallis测试对在不同时间间隔进行的ARI评分的可靠性表明,所有读数都是可靠的。没有任何清理程序能够将瓷釉恢复到其原始的光滑度。自蚀刻底漆和Sof-Lex圆盘清理方法的结合使搪瓷表面粗糙度(Ra值)最接近其预处理值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号